ModernProgressRing DoubleBounceProgressRingStyle

Mar 29, 2014 at 11:07 AM
It looks like i am not able to use custom style for ModernProgressRing:
<UserControl x:Class="PFAdmin.Pages.Purge"
             xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
             xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" 
             xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" 
             xmlns:mui="http://firstfloorsoftware.com/ModernUI"
             mc:Ignorable="d" 
             d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
    <Grid x:Name="gridMain" Style="{StaticResource ContentRoot}">
        <StackPanel>
            <TextBlock Text="OPERAZIONE DI PULIZA DEL DATABASE" Style="{StaticResource Heading2}" />
            <mui:BBCodeBlock BBCode="L'operazione di pulizia del database è irreversibile. In base alle dimensioni attuali del database potrebbe richiedere svariati minuti per essere completata. Prima di eseguire l'operazione è consigliabile:" Margin="0,20,0,0" />
            <mui:BBCodeBlock BBCode="- Non effettuare operazione sull'applicativo PrintFlow" Margin="0,3,0,0" />
            <mui:BBCodeBlock BBCode="- Effettuare un backup completo del database" Margin="0,3,0,0" />
            <Button x:Name="btnPurge" Content="Esegui" Height="Auto" Width="76" Click="btnPurge_Click" Margin="0,50,0,0" />
            <mui:ModernProgressRing x:Name="progressRing" IsActive="False" Width="80" Height="80" Style="{StaticResource DoubleBounceProgressRingStyle}" />
        </StackPanel>
    </Grid>
</UserControl>
Default style works fine but StaticResource DoubleBounceProgressRingStyle cannot be resolved by XAML parser, and throw an exception at runtime.
Apr 2, 2014 at 8:13 AM
I have the same problem, any help??
Apr 21, 2014 at 4:51 AM
Edited Apr 21, 2014 at 4:52 AM
I got same problem..
Nov 11, 2014 at 9:56 AM
Same here...but also in source code there is a problem with projects if u change from 4.5 to 4.0 .Net framework...i guess this is related to 4.0...